Many students oppose draft revival
November 28, 2006
Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), an outspoken proponent of reinstating the draft, recently announced his intention to introduce legislation for the reintroduction of selective service. Rangel said he believes that this will prevent politicians from launching unnecessary wars.
This point of view has met much criticism from college students, including several student activists at the UW.
"I think the draft is a bad idea," said Alicia LeVezu, president of Young Democrats at the UW (YDUW). "The lives of young men and women are important and need to be taken seriously. We can't just arbitrarily send them to war."
The supporting side of the draft holds that it will eliminate the socioeconomic inequalities in the military, in that service will no longer be an alternative for the poor, but a necessity for the rich as well, said Nicholas Fusso, vice president of development for YDUW.
"It does have validity," he said. "I think diversity can be a great thing....I don't think diversity should be enforced."
While many consider this a legitimate point of view, some hold that it has its flaws.
"I think the point that Rangel is trying to make is that the rich don't fight the wars," said Nicholas Baptise, president of the Socialist Alternative student club at the UW. "If you ask people in the military, I'm sure the majority of them would say [that they] don't have enough money."
"We totally disagree with Rangel," he continued. "The thing to do is end the war instead of spending billions. Take that money and put it into health care and education and creating jobs."
Still, many believe support for a reinstatement of the draft is lacking.
"This isn't the first time since the Iraq war that this has been proposed," Fusso said. "It's gained a little bit of support," he said, although LeVezu estimated that about 70 percent of the American public is not in favor.
Regardless of whether selective service was invoked or not, the socioeconomic injustices of the military would not be solved, Baptiste said.
"In the military, there's no democracy," he said. "[If] people are drafted from Harvard and people are drafted from the factories, the people from Harvard are automatically given these nice office jobs...and the poor people are sent to fight."
"The draft is still very oppressive to the poor in any situation," he said.
Reporter Jeffrey Tripoli: jeffreytripoli@thedaily.washington.edu
Comments
#1 ProustWasACommie
commented, onNovember 28, 2006 at 11:11 a.m.:
This is perhaps the dumbest article in a while in The Daily and the most obvious headline in a while...My God, aren't there other issues for you guys to explore than the obvious?
#2 RB
commented, onNovember 28, 2006 at 7:42 p.m.:
This article is shallow, and the sources are weak. Ms. LeVezu needs to understand that SOMEONE is going to fight (this is a response to her statement that the lives of young men and women are important). Of course they are important. The question remains-who will bear the burden of defense (no matter how you feel about a particular war)? The comment by Mr. Baptise about military servicemembers being poor is simply false. It is true that it is impossible to pay someone enough money for the sacrifices that we ask our military to make. It is also true that young soldiers with families sometimes have trouble making ends meet. Having said that, most military folks are able to live on their salary. Finally, as far as the military not being a democracy-thank goodness its true. The military takes great pains to be a MERITOCRACY, and a bad soldier from Harvard is still a bad soldier. Some people oppose a draft because they truly beleive it is a bad idea, and others oppose it because they only wish to cowardly serve themselves and their own interests. Thank God that our great country still has an elite few with a vision of what America was meant to be, and are willing to put their lives on the line for the rest of us. Please ask someone who has a clue next time you want to write about this, or any other topic.
Post a comment
You are not currently logged in. You must log in using your Facebook account to post a comment. It's fast, easy, and we don't store any of your personal information, except your first and last name when you post a comment.
Why?
Our old comment system was abused to leave racist, sexist, fradulent, or simply useless comments. We're hoping this verification step will improve the quality of our comments.
I don't have a Facebook account. I'd like to verify my identity using my MySpace/Google/Yahoo!/OpenID/SSN/주민등록번호/MasterCard.
Let us know. We're open to suggestions. Over the next few weeks, we'll be testing other authentication methods.
The FBI/CIA/TSA/CoS/Emmert is out to get me! I need to stay anonymous!
We're working on a way to allow this. If you have any ideas, email us.
I think this website is ugly.
It's going to be a work in progress all summer, so it may look and act differently from week to week. If you want to influence this process, email us. We read every email, and respond to most of them.