Increased mental health funding not the answer to campus violence
Jeff Tripoli
February 28, 2008
UW students are no strangers to the prospect of violence. The recent shootings at Northern Illinois, the latest in a string of high profile attacks on college campuses, has state legislators poised to act in an effort to prevent a similar occurrence in our own backyard.
I had the opportunity to sit in on a discussion between a group of UW student lobbyists and Rep. Deb Wallace, head of the state House Higher Education Committee. I was appalled at Wallace’s alarm that students had been assaulted in the immediate vicinity of campus. Wallace was clearly concerned, but the lack of information was unsettling.
Even more unsettling was Wallace’s proposed course of action, as outlined in an editorial she co-authored last week in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Wallace and Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles defended Gov. Christine Gregoire’s proposal to increase campus safety procedures and coordination, as well as funding for mental health care services.
I have nothing against either of these proposals, if done for the right reason. There’s no reason we shouldn’t have a clear outline and knowledge of emergency procedures should disaster strike. Increasing funding for mental health care, on the other hand, seems more of a knee-jerk reaction than a thought out approach to the issue of campus violence.
I’m all for increasing the availability of psychiatric care for students, but doing it under the guise of violence prevention is silly. I understand that the gunmen at places like Virginia Tech were deeply disturbed individuals who may have benefited from psychiatric help, but I’m more worried about getting strong-armed on my way home from the library than being gunned down by a peer on campus.
Tragic though they were, these aforementioned cataclysms were isolated events that may or may not have been preventable for any number of reasons. Assuming that such a tragedy wouldn’t have occurred if only the gunman had had access to more mental health services is a ridiculous presumption.
There’s the distinct possibility that these individuals were beyond help.
Furthermore, it’s unfair to put the burden of violence prevention on psychologists and psychiatrists. Violence prevention comes down to vigilance and law enforcement. There will always be incidents. To prevent incidents from becoming tragedies, the university should increase security on and off campus.
I admire Wallace’s conviction, but I hope they will focus on solving the issues at hand rather forcing through a convenient solution.
Comments
#1 Jenny Hyatt
commented, onFebruary 28, 2008 at 1:59 a.m.:
The level of stress that our young people on campus experience today is unparalleled. We have a large number of college students coming to bigwhitewall.com to talk about the issues they face - exam problems, issues with parents, loneliness, fall outs with professors, friendship issues and so on. There is much scope to encourage college students to use services such as bigwhitewall.com to air and work through their problems before they turn to violence, drugs, self harm or other negative behaviours. Not least they are all very web savvy.
bigwhitewall.com is a support network where people can express whatever is on their mind openly, honestly and anonymously. The anonymity is critical as people often do not want others to know that they are struggling or fear being judged or misunderstood. Our users express what they feel on bricks (using a state of the art Flash tool that can include your words, drawings and/or images) as well as finding peer support with those who are in similar situations. Many have posted to say how they have worked through the problems that they face through being on Big White Wall including stepping back from the brink of suicide. It is a time to think out of the box and find easily accessible ways for young people to work through their issues before they end up harming themselves or others.
Post a comment
You are not currently logged in. You must log in using your Facebook account to post a comment. It's fast, easy, and we don't store any of your personal information, except your first and last name when you post a comment.
Why?
Our old comment system was abused to leave racist, sexist, fradulent, or simply useless comments. We're hoping this verification step will improve the quality of our comments.
I don't have a Facebook account. I'd like to verify my identity using my MySpace/Google/Yahoo!/OpenID/SSN/주민등록번호/MasterCard.
Let us know. We're open to suggestions. Over the next few weeks, we'll be testing other authentication methods.
The FBI/CIA/TSA/CoS/Emmert is out to get me! I need to stay anonymous!
We're working on a way to allow this. If you have any ideas, email us.
I think this website is ugly.
It's going to be a work in progress all summer, so it may look and act differently from week to week. If you want to influence this process, email us. We read every email, and respond to most of them.