Fraternity members evicted, given little explanation
March 12, 2008
Twelve Lambda Chi Alpha fraternity members found themselves without a home this weekend, after a formal disciplinary hearing from the national chapter evicted the students without explanation.
“We weren’t clear exactly why this membership review was done,” said Michael Byrd, one of the evicted students. “They kind of hinted on some stuff, talking about accountability.”
Members of the fraternity were told one week prior to the hearing they might need to make other living arrangements, Byrd said. He brought his truck to the house as a precaution.
“I don’t believe the house falls below any standards,” he said. “We don’t have the usual party and drug problems; usually a house is shut down because somebody was raped, or died, or fell off the roof.”
The review took place Saturday, and students received eviction letters that evening asking them to move out by 3 p.m. the next day.
“To my knowledge, there wasn’t anything that I know of that would be grounds for [my] eviction,” Byrd said. “They’re in the process of trying to get the [information] to us. I think even the guys at the house don’t know. They all kind of heard bits and pieces, but there are no definite reasons.”
Nine members were expelled and three members were suspended after the review.
“Other University of Washington fraternities have undergone similar formal reviews in recent years and the change in direction has allowed their chapters to thrive,” wrote Scott Ladner, the former Lambda Chi Alpha president, in an e-mail. “We expect the same outcome for our chapter.”
The formal disciplinary hearing was part of an ongoing process during the past 30 days, Ladner wrote.
“All members of the chapter were reviewed and all were warned three weeks in advance that the result could be suspension or expulsion,” he wrote.
Reviews from the national chapter are typical, Byrd said. The last time members were expelled from his house was in the 1970s, he said.
“We have people come to the house twice a year,” he said. “I think it’s pretty common for nationals to come out.”
Byrd hopes to have some answers soon.
“Even some reason would be nice,” he said. “If they could just tell me that my interview went bad or my grades were bad, … I’d be okay with it if I just knew.”
[Reach reporter Arla Shephard at news@thedaily.washington.edu.]

Comments
#1 uw '08
commented, onMarch 11, 2008 at 11:52 p.m.:
Maybe they got kicked out for being overweight and unattractive like those Delta Zetas at DePauw.
#2 haha
commented, onMarch 12, 2008 at 10:42 a.m.:
that's funny. or hazing. that's my guessin
#3 former husky
commented, onMarch 12, 2008 at 12:09 p.m.:
Sounds like the members of the house are in denial. From the time you get to the University of Washington and join a fraternity, the rules are made clear. If you follow them, then you won't get into problems like this. It's that simple.
#4 4503
commented, onMarch 12, 2008 at 2:30 p.m.:
These dbags know why they were kicked out; they just don't want to admit it. Every fraternity has the dead weight they'd like to shed. I'm glad Lambdas made the move. The kid already confessed he has lousy grades, and every chapter has a policy on that. He probably provides no prositive light in the chapter, and is instead a detractor. I'm sure that headquarters would be happy to provide his parents with an explanation, but he probably doesn't want them to read it.
#5 Anon
commented, onMarch 12, 2008 at 4:18 p.m.:
I'm really disapointed in this article! It seems that the reporter could have interviewed someone outside of the fraternity, or at least someone who knew something, and was willing to tell. I don't think it should take someone being raped, dying, or being pushed off the roof for a frat member to be expelled, and I don't believe that the frat would randomly kick someone out without giving a good reason. Get some more perspective, Daily! We want the facts!
#6 ANON
commented, onMarch 12, 2008 at 6:09 p.m.:
Clearly everyone is afraid of being sued for slander if they publicly divulge the reasons. I'm sure the bruthas know exactly why they were removed. What happened to good investigative journalism? Must have been a slow day for news at the Daily.
#7 Waitaminute
commented, onMarch 12, 2008 at 8:45 p.m.:
The chapter president nailed it. Membership reviews are a common procedure and used when the chapter members themselves cannot or will not hold members accountable. Think in terms of surgery to remove a cyst. The MR gives the good members a chance to improve without dealing with idiots. And, there is no obligation by the national fraternity to reveal the reasons for the decisions. Does the chapter reveal why someone did or did not receive a bid? The privacy of the organization extends to the national organization. Investigative journalism has nothing to do with that--the reporter did an excellent job of presenting both sides with the information available.
#8 Anonymous
commented, onMarch 14, 2008 at 6:26 p.m.:
To those expelled: [you don't] "fit the mold of Lambda Chi Alpha," explained the nationals representative that night just before letters were given. I know Mike Byrd who has a cumulative gpa of over 3.4 and is a mechanical engineer with a paid internship with boeing. The Daily did a bad job, and Kiro 7 did an even worse one. Perhaps it will be for the best; only time will tell.
Post a comment
You are not currently logged in. You must log in using your Facebook account to post a comment. It's fast, easy, and we don't store any of your personal information, except your first and last name when you post a comment.
Why?
Our old comment system was abused to leave racist, sexist, fradulent, or simply useless comments. We're hoping this verification step will improve the quality of our comments.
I don't have a Facebook account. I'd like to verify my identity using my MySpace/Google/Yahoo!/OpenID/SSN/주민등록번호/MasterCard.
Let us know. We're open to suggestions. Over the next few weeks, we'll be testing other authentication methods.
The FBI/CIA/TSA/CoS/Emmert is out to get me! I need to stay anonymous!
We're working on a way to allow this. If you have any ideas, email us.
I think this website is ugly.
It's going to be a work in progress all summer, so it may look and act differently from week to week. If you want to influence this process, email us. We read every email, and respond to most of them.